Saturday, February 1, 2014

Week Three: School Improvement

District Improvement , Recommendations and Actions
Seymour Community School Corporation
Lisa Ferguson


Project:  Advanc-Ed District Accreditation

Seymour Community School Corporation is a member of Advanc-Ed.  Our district has worked to attain district accreditation.  Accredited schools are recognized as schools that adhere to a set of educational standards.  Accredited schools provide students with diplomas that are recognized and accepted to open the door to opportunities for students to access schooling, training, and career options beyond high school.  Advanc-ED accreditation means that we look at our district as a whole- the programs, the culture, and the community-to determine how well the parts work together to meet the needs of students.  It is our way of proclaiming that we offer a quality education for all.  The self-evaluation opportunity that the accreditation process provides lets us compare ourselves against a set of quality standards.  This produces a wealth of insights into district practices.  This year our school district participated in an on-site review.  I was in charge of this facilitating this event for the district.  The external review equips us to look at our performance through an objective lens.  The goal of participation in Advanc-ED District Accreditation is to continually improve to drive student achievement to high levels for all students.

Advanc-ED Standards for Quality School Systems
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction
The system maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous improvement that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning.
Standard 2: Governance and Leadership
The system operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness.
Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning
The system’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses.
Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems
The system has resources and provides services in all schools that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students.
Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement
The system implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.

The following is a summary of the findings, recommendations and the actions we are taking to address identified areas of need:

1.      Develop/Market a district vision.
Our district vision should communicate that which we strive to achieve.

A steering committee of stakeholder representatives was established to begin development of a vision and a mission for our district.  The committee met several times to develop these statements.  Once developed, the statements were sent to all stakeholders in our district for input and feedback.  The steering committee reviewed input and finalized a recommendation.  For Seymour it is:
Seymour Community Schools, in partnership with our community, improves lives by providing an exceptional educational foundation that inspires a passion for learning and equips all to be productive, meaningful contributors to a global society.
Our mission is related to what we do each day to accomplish the vision.  Our mission:  Teaching to Learn, Learning to Apply, Applying to Life, Assessing to Improve.

We will post these statements in our buildings and on our website.  We handed out T-shirts with our mission on them just after it was established. 
 
2.      Develop/monitor a systemic and comprehensive plan to evaluate and use data to impact student achievement at the classroom level.
Seymour has worked very hard to address this recommendation.  We now have staff in place to harvest and organize data for our teachers.  This data is used to design instruction to impact achievement.  We have Response to Instruction plans and teams of staff in place.  Response to Instruction (RTI) simply involves identifying a student struggling, making a plan to intervene to help the student, and tracking data to see if the student improved.  Depending upon the results of the intervention, a new plan is developed for the child.  We have purchased a subscription to secure a data warehouse.  This is an electronic storage area accessible to all teaching staff.  The warehouse is called the Student Data Analysis Warehouse (SDA).  This warehouse stores all of the test result data for each of our students.  Assessments such as, ISTEP, mClass, Star, and Acuity are housed in the warehouse. Instructional staff need this data to make decisions about curriculum and instruction.

3.      Develop an accountability system to insure district initiatives are implemented with fidelity while providing district level leadership and systematic monitoring throughout the district.
We have established regular meetings of grade levels to discuss district initiatives.  We now have a publication called The Beacon that serves to distribute information about district initiatives to all employees.  We have websites established to provide access points for staff, parents, and community.  An example is the curriculum website that houses copies of The Beacon.  We established teacher and principal induction programs.  We have O.W.L. Vision (Opportunities to Watch and Learn).   This is an online training site that is produced by Seymour Schools with specific information about district initiatives for our staff.  This online training site offers all staff access to information.

4.      Implement a focused professional development plan to address staff training needs to achieve district goals in the areas of technology, RTI, Data Analysis, and best practices for differentiation.
Seymour Community Schools offers training opportunities for all staff.  Seymour needs to develop a plan to organize and focus these training opportunities.  For example, we are currently planning for the summer of 2014.   The plan includes training on technology, curriculum, data, and best instructional practices.  We have purchased PD express.  It is an online professional development organizational tool. It will list trainings opportunities available by date, location, and time.   Once a training is completed, staff can use PD Express to track the trainings they have attended.  The Title 1 schools hired instructional coaches to provide information, materials, and training to teachers at Jackson, Brown, and Redding.  Schools across the district are hosting book studies.  Two books we are using are Sheltered Instruction for English Language Learners by Jana J. Echevarria, MaryEllen Vogt, and Deborah J. Short and Small Group Instruction by Debbie Diller. We also have a Moodle Page reserved to provide relevant resources to teachers K-12. 


5.  Articulate curriculum K-12 both vertically and horizontally, and measure student achievement through regular formative assessments.
Of all the areas, this is the recommendations that we have been working tirelessly to address over the past two years.  Teachers have been meeting and collaborating to develop curriculum maps.  Maps come in two forms:
Diary Maps:  Diary maps provide teachers with a record of what they taught during a given period of time.
Consensus Maps:  A consensus map reflects the content agreed on by a professional staff and targets those specific areas in each discipline and across disciplines that are to be addressed with consistency in our district.
In order to interpret data to improve achievement, we must be able to track what we have taught and how we taught it.  Seymour Schools is working to complete consensus maps that include common vocabulary and formative assessments K-12.  We are recommending that a compensation model be developed to support time beyond a regular school day for staff to collaborate and write curriculum.


Strategies for the Evaluation of these recommendations:

1)       Rubrics:  Seymour Schools will utilize rubrics to evaluate each recommendations made for school improvement .  Advanc-Ed provides specific rubrics for each of these recommendations.  Here is an example of one section of a rubric for Curriculum and Assessment:

3.2
Curriculum, instruction, and assessment throughout the system are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice.
Your Rating

Performance levels
1st
2nd
3rd
ß External Review Team Work Sessions



4
Using data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice, system and school personnel systematically monitor and adjust curriculum, instruction and assessment to ensure vertical and horizontal alignment and alignment with goals for achievement and instruction and statements of purpose.



3
Using data from student assessments and an examination of professional practice, system and school personnel monitor and adjust curriculum, instruction and assessment to ensure vertical and horizontal alignment and alignment with goals for achievement and instruction and statements of purpose.



2
System personnel monitor and adjust curriculum, instruction and assessment to ensure for vertical and horizontal alignment and alignment with the goals for achievement and instruction and statements of purpose.



1
System personnel rarely or never monitor and adjust curriculum, instruction and assessment to ensure vertical and horizontal alignment or alignment with the goals for achievement and instruction and statements of purpose.



4
There is a systematic, collaborative process in place to ensure alignment each time curriculum, instruction and/or assessments are reviewed or revised at the system or school level.



3
There is a process in place to ensure alignment each time curriculum, instruction and/or assessments are reviewed or revised at the system or school level.



2
A process is implemented sometimes to ensure alignment when curriculum, instruction and/or assessments are reviewed or revised at the system or school level.



1
No process exists to ensure alignment when curriculum, instruction and/or assessments are reviewed or revised.



4
The continuous improvement process has clear guidelines to ensure that vertical and horizontal alignment as well as alignment with the system’s purpose are maintained and enhanced in curriculum, instruction and assessment.



3
The continuous improvement process ensures that vertical and horizontal alignment as well as alignment with the system’s purpose are maintained and enhanced in curriculum, instruction and assessment.



2
There is limited evidence that the continuous improvement process ensures vertical and horizontal alignment and alignment with the system’s purpose in curriculum, instruction and assessment.



1
There is little or no evidence that the continuous improvement process is connected with vertical and horizontal alignment or alignment with the system’s purpose in curriculum, instruction and assessment.


Ratings will be reported for each recommendation each quarter.

2)      Surveys
We will be surveying stakeholders to gather data on our progress in the specified areas of recommendation.  We will utilize Advanc-Ed surveys, survey monkey and google forms.
This strategy will keep all stakeholders involved in the process and informed.  We will share the results with participants each quarter.
3)       Data Analysis
We will gather and monitor data.  Our plan is to have data meetings each quarter to discuss and adjust plans based on the data.


Reflection on what was learned:
This was a very in-depth process.  I had the opportunity to work with all staff in all buildings in our district.   This experience gave me the opportunity to look at the system rather than an individual school or an individual classroom.  Systems thinking is the task that falls to all superintendents.  As superintendent you are interested in the efficiency of all systems at work in your district.  You are also interested in how effectively these systems work together.  I was fortunate to have the opportunity, through my internship, to lead this process in our district.  I learned many things throughout the process.  I had moments of great joy and feelings of accomplishment as well as frustration beyond anything I had experienced in my career.  I think it is very representative of a superintendent’s role.  After working so hard for so long, it was difficult to listen to the Advanc-Ed teams critique.  I found that I was so emotionally invested that it was hard to take a step back.  For me, I learned that I must develop strategies to keep the tasks separated from the person.  I can take things much too personally.  In the role of superintendent, the individual must keep a healthy perspective. 
A second thing I learned had to do with time management.  Effective school improvement involves planning not only for the use of resources but also time.  Working with staff in eight different buildings along with administrators and parents involves a great time commitment.  A superintendent must be able to prioritize, communicate effectively, and develop multiple options to accomplish tasks.  I used technology to help me efficiently use my time.  The Advanc-Ed improvement process involved the gathering of multiple types of documentation items.  We started out with folders and binders.  I soon learned this was time consuming and costly.  We switched our tactic.  I set up an electronic option for organization through Drop Box.  Our standard chairpersons could scan and drop documentation items to the drop box electronic folders.  These files could then be easily shared with the visiting team.  The drop box was organized by standard down to the indicator.   We did not have to meet in person to communicate about our district documentation files.  We could “chat” with each other through the program and we could view the items of documentation at any time throughout the district.  We could have any number of individuals working on the standards and indicators at one time.  It was so effective that participants continued to use the program in their respective departments. 
Finally, I learned that initiatives are accomplished through collaboration.  As we continued through each step of the process it was clear that we must collaborate.  One person can not do it.  Even if an individual could, the value is diminished.  True value is established through the participation and investment of the entire learning community.   
I am please to report that Advanc-Ed award full district accreditation to Seymour Community Schools.  The recommendations included in this entry are a result of the in-depth audit.  As a district, we will continue to move forward. 


Superintendent Internship Supervisor Meeting


I meet regularly with my supervisor, Robert Hooker.  We discuss the program and tasks I am working on through my intern plan.  This week we had the opportunity to go over each of the activities in my plan.   We talked about what was accomplished and learned.   Mr. Hooker shared thoughts and suggestions for next steps.  He anxiously awaits my completion of this course of study and the award of certification.   I have provided a copy of the Supervisor Evaluation Form to him.   He will be completing it and sending it to Dr. Arterbury as directed on the form.

No comments:

Post a Comment