The practice of
goal driven budgeting was a new concept to me since I live in Indiana. After greater study, I have come to realize
that much of what is put into practice with goal driven budgeting is also
evident in Indiana. According to Dr.
Arterbury, the purpose of a goal driven budget is to assist in the attainment
of a shared vision for the school district.
In other words, goals are established and the budget is structured to
support these goals. Of course, we know that each school district has fixed
costs that restrict the amount of money that can be devoted to goals. Salaries, fuel, electricity, and maintenance
are a few examples of costs that must be addressed.
As I have said,
Indiana does not proclaim to use a goal driven budgeting process but I can see
the similarities between Indiana and Texas.
In Indiana we are not required to have site-based improvement committees
or a district improvement plan. Each individual
school has an improvement plan and our school board establishes goals. Therefore, to describe how goal driven
budgeting is utilized through our district improvement plan, I will need to
share information with you about our district goals. This year district goals for Seymour
Community Schools include the following:
1)
Focus
on student learning, achievement, and opportunities.
2)
Focus
on increasing teachers’ and administrator’s knowledge and skills.
3)
Seek
and facilitate meaningful participation of families and community as supportive
and informed partners in the education of our students.
4)
Increase
the capacity of our facilities and ensure the safety, comfort, access, and security
of students, staff and the community.
5)
Maintain
a financial balance when budgeting for school programs for a stable corporation
during unstable financial times
6)
Create
a school corporation administrator transition plan
Examples of how
our budget is driven by these goals can be found in recent board action to
begin a study to determine facility needs.
Since one of our goals is to increase the capacity of our facilities,
the board is now engaged in reviewing various proposals for additions,
reorganization, or redistricting to meet the needs of our students. The budget is supporting the engagement of
various architects to provide information and direction. Another goal supported by the budget deals
with safety and security. Our school
corporation has sought grants and will use budgeting to support the
implementation of multiple school resource officers stationed in
buildings.
In Indiana, and
I would assume the same is true for Texas, a large portion of the budget is set
aside for people or salaries. During my
superintendent interview, this point was made very clear. He stated that whatever our goals may be, the
bulk of our expenditures are for people.
We accomplish our goals through human resources.
To conclude, one big difference between Indiana and Texas can be found
in the amount of communication sought from stakeholders. From my experience in Indiana, this has not
been an area of focus. The budgeting
process takes place between the superintendent, school board, and business
manager in our district. There are
required public meetings but rarely does anyone attend let alone participate in
the budgeting process. I really liked
the idea shared in the book, Learning from the Best: Lessons from Award Winning Superintendents,
of forging a strong coalition of the school board, administration, staff,
parents, and community. If I have
learned anything so far in my study of the superintendency, communication and
collaboration are key to the success of any budget or initiative in the school
setting.
No comments:
Post a Comment